![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Understanding Economics of the Internet vs. the PSTN While Unravelling the Dynamics of Successful FTTH Overbuilds of the Incumbents in The NetherlandsHow to purchase this issue. $300 or $900 group. The Novcember December 2006 issue offers a a discussion of internet versus telco economics in the light of complexity economic theory and two interviews of fiber to the home networks in Holland.October 30, 2006 Ewing, NJ -- Executive SummaryIntroductionThe November December issue begins with a short essay that puts into focus the confusions of the on going technology and economic transition. We are in the midst of a hierarchically-oriented, large corporate, siloed, command and control organization that characterizes both telecommunications and our economy. Struggling to emerge is an edge-based web of relations where users of ICT and the Internet are as likely to create their own content as to consume it. The essay offers a hypothesis that value (what people want and will pay for) will be derived from not from the old fashioned vertical hierarchy but rather from the decentralized web of relations between users at the edge of the network.Beinhocker’s Origins of WealthWe are still trying to see the future from the midst of a technology upheaval that fundamentally overturns many of our ideas about where and how wealth profits are being created.In two parts (pp. 5 -13 and pp 14-23) I undertake an extensive essay that is a review and summary discussion of the chain of arguments in Beinhocker’ s very informative book. I find that, when he explains the difference between what he calls traditional economics and the newly emerging field of complexity economics, the first reflects circuit switched telephony very well. The relatively static equilibrium point of view of how the world works fits well with non innovative state of the PSTN. He points out that social scientists who followed the development of complexity theory began to wonder whether economies too might be a type of complex, adaptive system. If economies do unfold as part of a complex adaptive system rather than a static one that tends toward equilibrium states, “we have a new set of tools for working out an understanding of what is happening. [This] means that wealth is a product of evolutionary processes.“ [. . .] and finally “history shows that each time there has been a major shift in the paradigm of economic theory the tremors have been felt far beyond the academic worlds.” I speculate that managers who have grown up with phone companies have a genetic code that is predisposed to the static point of view of the world as a series of vertical silos where their business model is controlling and all inclusive of what their “customers” can do. Meanwhile the Internet, having quickly grown to global scope, certainly reminds one of a complex adoptive system. He asserts that “wealth creation is the product of a simple, but profoundly powerful formula – differentiate, select, and amplify – the formula of evolution. The same process that has driven the growing order and complexity of the biosphere has driven the growing order and complexity of the ‘econosphere.’” He continues: “In short, evolution’s simple recipe of "differentiate, select and amplify" is a type of computer program – a program for creating novelty, knowledge and growth. Because evolution is a form of information processing, it can do its order creating work in realms ranging from computer software to the mind, to human culture and to the economy.” He sees markets as the playing fields on which business plans compete and evolve. Finally he makes a very important point that there is an important role for government – namely to see that the playing filed of the market is level and not tilted in favor of certain business plans whose backers have been able to buy special favors. These are old ideas that unfortunately among many governments of the last twenty years or so have gone out of favor. Beinhocker finds that companies don’t innovate - markets do. If one looks at the largest and most successful corporations from thirty, fifty and 100 years ago one will find few of today’s successful companies in those listings. He invites us to consider “a brutal truth about most companies. Markets are highly dynamic, but the vast majority of companies are not.” Beinhocker doesn’t pretend to write about or to even understand the complexity of the internet. Nevertheless, the Internet is an ecosystem that that seems well at home in the dynamic and rapidly changing complexity markets that Beinhocker describes. From my point of view as one with out any economics background but one who is determined to understand this evolving technology as a complex system that is still in search of a viable business model, what Beinhocker writes about fills a sizable void.
Fiber in HollandWhile the Amsterdam fiber build has now actually begun, there are many innovative fiber builds going on over the entire country. In two interviews I take an illuminating look at the economics and players in the Dutch market. The first Interview is with Hendrick Rood who writing a doctoral dissertation at Delft and works as a consultant for Stratix. Hendrik describes a rich variety of fiber business models in the Netherlands.He finds some green field builds, and then some municipal builds like Amsterdam. Then he talks about housing corporations and finally cooperative builds like Neunen. He describes the varied characteristics of each. Having done this. however. he goes on to outline the complex emergence of private building efforts by Dik Wessels and Martien Koster. These are quite convoluted and equally fascinating. The major news is that they have managed in 2006 to do profitable purely commercial overbuilds of Neunen and Heilligom, two small towns. Wessels is the emerging telecom, fiber and construction magnate who directs a fiber laying company that does a very cost effective job and that ,after six years of shrewd maneuvering around KPN the national carrier, has put together a phalanx of fiber companies and bank holding and finance companies that can handle all aspects of fiber builds. Rood explains how with subsidiary companies and a huge profit on a major sale of the peak day of the Nasdaq in March of 2000 Wessels is in the enviable position of having the resources and talent to finance and engineer purely commercial fiber overbuilds of the incumbent carrier and cable system operators. With a cost effective technique and outstanding marketing he is getting an outstanding take rate of 73 to 80 % and better though out the first small systems he has built. The whole episode has a very intriguing social dynamic where KPN the incumbent has suddenly opened requests to lay its own fiber along sides the projects served by Wessels. The take rate is so spectacular that the incumbents don’t have a large enough group of customers left in the towns to survive on their own. The second interview is directly in the Wessels camp.
Marco Westenberg is the engineer, now Business Development Manager - who
guided Dik Wessels from the building of basic infrastructure trenches
for things like gas and sewer into fiber and telecom. Marco is an
astute observer of complicated processes. He said that he concluded: If
you have an open trench why not stick fiber in it? Marco explains how
he figured out how to build better and cheaper than the competition and,
in doing this, how he helped lead Dik Wessels into telecom and fiber to
the home. This is an inside look at the most innovative strategy yet seen in the FTTH market. It says that in planning, marketing, and execution, financial success is likely to be achieved only by leadership that encompasses thorough technical and business process knowledge all the way from physical network construction through to customer expectations. These two interviews contain much detail about an intriguing new business model currently unfolding in a critical and highly wired European country. British Telecom- A Leader at the Global Level for Telco 2.0 Transformation?Matt Bross CTO BT Group said this summer: “IT has moved from being an internal support system to becoming a strategic business driver at our company.” British Telecom is clearly redesigning itself. In 2004 he brought the former CIO of DRKW Al Noor Ramji in as CIO. And now on October 1, 2006 the current CIO who replaced Al Noor at Dresdner JP Rangaswami has moved to BT as CIO of BT’s Global Services Division – BT’s new flagship all IP 21st century network. Ramji was quoted in June as seeing Google as BT’s biggest competitor. He gets it totally – no doubt there. These two men see more clearly than just a handful of others how the incumbent phone company must evolve. Judging by BT’s move it is fully attuned to the critical need to find and enable talent.My commentary examines the thinking of the men involved and concludes that for the first time a major incumbent has adopted the views of its critics and is using them to redesign itself in keeping with the values of open source and the internet. Is Robert Kjelberg Building what Bob Frankston Wants?Robert Kjelberg of Malarenergie and Bob Frankston compare notes on fiber as infrastructure in Sweden and extrapolate to the rest of the world. I had told Bob that what Robert had built in Vasteras Sweden seemed the closest thing I had ever seen to the basic connectivity between towns and cities that Bob had been saying he is looking for.The two men have a very clear meeting of the minds that the network must be an infrastructure system of glass highways where property owners pay a one time fee for connection to their regional infrastructure and then cities build out connections to each other. Bob writes: “To shift your model a little --- you’ve gotten
people to extend their driveways far enough so they connect to each other
and you can now tell them they’ve built a road system. The next
step locally is to make shift the funding model to a common funding model
that, in effect, creates a lot more capacity. In particular it means there is no reason not to provide complete wireless
coverage for all – that includes those passing through the town
just like road users. The cities themselves can start to presume that
everyone and everything is connected. This means that they can use it
for basic services and communications.” [Editor – as Fort
Wayne is doing.] The Symposium Discussions from mid August to mid OctoberReaders should scan the Table of Contents for what is here that they will value. They will find primarily two things. The first will be “news briefs covering such things as fiber in Europe, new internet architecture, wi-fi troubles in San Francisco, a discussion of peering and so on. The second will be some philosophically oriented discussions of economics (including Beinhocker) and the questions of where and how wealth and value is created in the midst of this chaotic global communications revolution.For the rest of the issue you will have to subscribe. ContentsDefining the Economic Value of the InternetA Look at How the Definition of Value and its Means of Creation are Rapidly Changing Thinking About a Meta-web p. 1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||